Back to Home

    Podcasts & Media

    Conversations on AI, legal tech, and the future of professional practice.

    The AI Pod with Wes Roth & Dylan Curious – The Anthropic-Pentagon Standoff
    Wes Roth

    The AI Pod with Wes Roth & Dylan Curious – The Anthropic-Pentagon Standoff

    Host: Wes Roth & Dylan Curious•February 2026

    A private company told the Pentagon "no" — and now it's in federal court. The Anthropic-Pentagon standoff is the most consequential AI legal battle of our time. Matt Mishak broke down the legal dimensions on the AI Pod with Wes Roth and Dylan Curious — two of the sharpest minds covering AI today.

    Wes Roth has built one of the most trusted voices in AI media, with 300K+ YouTube subscribers who tune in because he doesn't just report the news — he connects the dots most people miss. Dylan Curious brings a rare combination of philosophical depth and technical fluency that makes their conversations unlike anything else in the space. Together, they've interviewed Nick Bostrom, Joscha Bach, Emad Mostaque, and other pioneers shaping the frontier.

    Matt first met them at the Ai4 conference at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, alongside Ohio State Representative Joe Miller (D-Amherst) — one of the most forward-thinking legislators on technology and workforce issues in Ohio. That trip reinforced a conviction: the people writing our laws need to be in the rooms where AI's future is decided.

    Since the Interview

    → Feb 27President Trump ordered all federal agencies to stop using Anthropic. Hegseth designated the company a supply chain risk — a label typically reserved for foreign adversaries.
    → March 4Reports confirmed Claude is still being used in the Iran conflict — even as the Pentagon calls Anthropic a national security threat.
    → March 9Anthropic sued the federal government.
    → This weekMicrosoft and retired military leaders filed in support of Anthropic.

    Key Legal Takeaways

    • The supply chain risk designation appears legally deficient — no Congressional notification, no formal investigation, no exhaustion of less restrictive alternatives. Compare that to the Kaspersky Lab precedent.
    • The Fourth Amendment must evolve. In United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), the Supreme Court unanimously held that warrantless GPS tracking constitutes a search. Now multiply that surveillance power by AI. We are one legal gap away from a police state.
    • Law is built on precedent. AI moves at exponential speed. Those two realities are colliding — right now, in real time.
    Wes Roth on YouTubeDeeper Analysis on LegalTek.aiFollow LegalTek AI on LinkedIn

    #TimTalk – Deskilling Vs Upskilling with AI: What It Means and Where You Want to Be

    Host: Timothy Hughes•February 26, 2026•21:28

    Is AI making us smarter, or just making us lazy? According to the latest data from the Anthropic Economic Index, AI is now covering nearly 50% of professional tasks, but the productivity gains aren't evenly distributed. In this episode, Matt Mishak discusses "De-Skilling vs. Up-Skilling" — how to use AI for high-judgment work without losing your edge, and why human oversight remains the ultimate competitive advantage in an automated world.

    Timothy Hughes on YouTube